Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct - v3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 7:27 pm

On Wednesday 01 October 2008 07:14, Suresh Siddha wrote:

That's gone away in -mm.



It would be better if another flag is used, yes.

Setting PageReserved used to prevent put_page from decrementing the page's
refcount. Most drivers still do it just because we kept that code in there
to catch any bugs caused by the removal of PageReserved check from the
refcounting.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Venkatesh Pallipadi, (Fri Sep 12, 5:00 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Sep 13, 10:03 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Sep 14, 7:18 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Venki Pallipadi, (Tue Sep 23, 2:46 pm)
RE: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Tue Sep 23, 2:48 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 23, 2:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct - v3, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 1, 7:27 pm)