login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
October
»
18
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...>
To: James Courtier-Dutton <James@...>
Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <agospoda@...>, Ronciak, John <john.ronciak@...>, Allan, Bruce W <bruce.w.allan@...>, Graham, David <david.graham@...>, <kkiel@...>, <tglx@...>, <chris.jones@...>, <arjan@...>
Subject:
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
Date: Saturday, October 18, 2008 - 6:49 pm
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
quoted text
> > Many of the reports seem to be related in time to a graphics crash, no one > > has been able to give us more detail about how to reproduce. We NEED HELP > > reproducing this. Steps, hints, anything. We are trying rebooting, > > suspending, opensuse, fedora, ubuntu, and several hardware platforms, etc. > I would suspect the ipv6 module instead of the graphics. It has a number > of bugs in it. I am just mentioning it in case it helps.
The culprit of the bug has already been identified. It has been CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 9:50 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, James Courtier-Dutton
, (Sat Oct 18, 3:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Sat Oct 18, 6:49 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Karsten Keil
, (Fri Sep 26, 3:19 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Brandeburg
, (Fri Sep 26, 1:44 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:01 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Karsten Keil
, (Fri Sep 26, 10:23 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:13 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Sep 26, 7:49 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 1:52 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:23 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Tim Gardner
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:53 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Fri Sep 26, 8:05 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Tim Gardner
, (Sat Sep 27, 12:20 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Fri Sep 26, 6:04 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Fri Sep 26, 6:23 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Sat Sep 27, 2:45 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:39 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:43 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 11:52 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 12:20 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Mon Sep 29, 12:24 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 1:18 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 1:36 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 6:43 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Sep 26, 3:12 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Chris Snook
, (Thu Sep 25, 9:58 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:04 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
David Miller
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 013/196] Documentation: Replace obsolete "driverfs" with "sysfs".
James Bottomley
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Jeff Garzik
Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Andrew Morton
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
446 guests
online.
Syndicate