On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:13:08 -0600
dougthompson@xmission.com wrote:

quoted text
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> The cell_edac driver is setting the edac_mode field of the
> csrow's to an incorrect value, causing the sysfs show routine
> for that field to go out of an array bound and Oopsing the kernel
> when used.

Well that sounds a bit wrong of it.

quoted text
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/edac/cell_edac.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/drivers/edac/cell_edac.c	2008-10-15 15:35:21.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-work/drivers/edac/cell_edac.c	2008-10-15 15:35:29.000000000 +1100
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void __devinit cell_edac_init_csr
>  		csrow->nr_pages = (r.end - r.start + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		csrow->last_page = csrow->first_page + csrow->nr_pages - 1;
>  		csrow->mtype = MEM_XDR;
> -		csrow->edac_mode = EDAC_FLAG_EC | EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
> +		csrow->edac_mode = EDAC_SECDED;
>  		dev_dbg(mci->dev,
>  			"Initialized on node %d, chanmask=0x%x,"
>  			" first_page=0x%lx, nr_pages=0x%x\n",

Seems to be needed in 2.6.27.x?  Applies OK to 2.6.26, 2.6.25, etc.

How far back shold we port this?

Thanks.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/