That afaics has one minor downside: You don't know in advance how the
next kernel is going to be called. Example: the kernel that is currently
developed could become 2008.4 (the fifth kernel in 2008) if this
development cycle in the end is one of the quicker ones and gets
finished this year. But if everything is a bit slower then it might
become 2009.0 (the first one in 2009).
Hence people that write a lot of articles about things that happen in
linux land (like LWN.net or I do) would be forced to write sentences
like "[...]the kernel that will become 2008.3 or 2009.0 will have
feature foo that works like this[...]". That will get really confusing
if you read those articles half a year later -- especially if that
kernel became 2008.3 in the end, because foo in 2009.0 might already
look quite different again...
Please paint a tux on top of the roof.
CU
thl
--
Thorsten Leemhuis
c't- Magazin für Computertechnik web http://www.heise.de/ct/
Heise Zeitschriften Verlag GmbH&Co.KG phone +49 (0)511 5352 300
Helstorfer Str. 7 icq 140593172
D-30625 Hannover, Germany jabber thl_at_work@jabber.ccc.de
/* Heise Zeitschriften Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Registergericht:
Amtsgericht Hannover HRA 26709; Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin:
Heise Zeitschriften Verlag Geschäftsführung GmbH, Registergericht:
Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 60405 Geschäftsführer: Ansgar Heise,
Steven P. Steinkraus, Dr. Alfons Schräder */
--