Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

quoted text
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:58:10PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> 
>> This adds __d_instantiate() for users which is already taking
>> dcache_lock, and replace with it.
>> 
>> The part of d_add_ci() isn't equivalent. But it should be needed
>> fsnotify_d_instantiate() actually, because the path is to add the
>> inode to negative dentry.  fsnotify_d_instantiate() should be called
>> after change from negative to positive.
>> 
>> __d_instantiate_unique() and d_materialise_unique() does opencoded
>> optimized version. From history, it seems a intent, so just add comment.
>
> Looks good, but I think those "optimized' version should also be
> converted, a single if shouldn't matter with todays branch predictors.

Me too.

Trond, do you care the following convert? E.g.

in d_materialise_unique():

from
		dentry->d_inode = NULL;
		goto found_lock;
to
		__d_instantiate(dentry, NULL);
		goto found_lock;
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/