On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:59:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:52:46 -0400 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:41:17 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > +static int async_active = 0;
> > > 
> > > ?
> > ok will add comment
> 
> I was actually "?"ing at the "= 0".  I thought that would be obvious
> but it's whizzed past two people so far :(

Is there evidence that some gccs will not add such variable to .bss?

Because "= 0;" is more readable.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/