Re: Please pull - generic HDLC

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008 - 10:53 pm

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:47:04PM -0700, David Miller wrote:

Ignoring whether it will go into 2.6.28 or 2.6.29 there seems to be a 
more fundamental issue:

The over 3 weeks old -next already contains mostly the same as the HDLC 
tree contains now.

The thing you two should sort out is why the tree ended up as an own 
tree in -next instead of pull requests to David long ago.

E.g. the netdev and wireless trees also don't go into -next, but instead 
with frequent pull requests to David.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Please pull - generic HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sun Oct 12, 2:12 pm)
Re: Please pull - generic HDLC, David Miller, (Sun Oct 12, 2:47 pm)
Re: Please pull - generic HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sun Oct 12, 3:35 pm)
Re: Please pull - generic HDLC, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 12, 10:53 pm)
Re: Please pull - generic HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa, (Mon Oct 13, 7:53 am)
Re: Please pull - generic HDLC, David Miller, (Mon Oct 13, 11:23 am)