H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>> No, we're not getting anywhere.  This is an outright broken idea.  
>> The space is too small to be able to chop up in this way, and the 
>> number of vendors too large to be able to do it without having a 
>> central oversight.
>>
>
> I suspect we can get a larger number space if we ask Intel & AMD.  In 
> fact, I think we should request that the entire 0x40xxxxxx numberspace 
> is assigned to virtualization *anyway*.

Yes, that would be good.  In that case I'd revise my proposal to back 
each leaf block 256 leaves instead of 16.  But it still needs to be a 
proper enumeration with signatures, rather than assigning fixed points 
in that space to specific interfaces.

    J
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/