[PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 8:14 am

The current method of overlaying the page frame as the buffer page pointer
can be very dangerous and limits our ability to do other things with
a page from the buffer, like send it off to disk.

This patch allocates the buffer_page instead of overlaying the page's
page frame. The use of the buffer_page has hardly changed due to this.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux-tip.git/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-tip.git.orig/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c	2008-10-01 09:37:23.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-tip.git/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c	2008-10-01 11:03:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -115,16 +115,10 @@ void *ring_buffer_event_data(struct ring
  * Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for suggesting this idea.
  */
 struct buffer_page {
-	union {
-		struct {
-			unsigned long	 flags;		/* mandatory */
-			atomic_t	 _count;	/* mandatory */
-			u64		 time_stamp;	/* page time stamp */
-			unsigned	 size;		/* size of page data */
-			struct list_head list;		/* list of free pages */
-		};
-		struct page page;
-	};
+	u64		 time_stamp;	/* page time stamp */
+	unsigned	 size;		/* size of page data */
+	struct list_head list;		/* list of free pages */
+	void *page;			/* Actual data page */
 };
 
 /*
@@ -133,9 +127,9 @@ struct buffer_page {
  */
 static inline void free_buffer_page(struct buffer_page *bpage)
 {
-	reset_page_mapcount(&bpage->page);
-	bpage->page.mapping = NULL;
-	__free_page(&bpage->page);
+	if (bpage->page)
+		__free_page(bpage->page);
+	kfree(bpage);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -237,11 +231,16 @@ static int rb_allocate_pages(struct ring
 	unsigned i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
+		page = kzalloc_node(ALIGN(sizeof(*page), cache_line_size()),
+				    GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+		if (!page)
+			goto free_pages;
+		list_add(&page->list, &pages);
+
 		addr = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!addr)
 			goto free_pages;
-		page = (struct buffer_page *)virt_to_page(addr);
-		list_add(&page->list, &pages);
+		page->page = (void *)addr;
 	}
 
 	list_splice(&pages, head);
@@ -262,6 +261,7 @@ static struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *
 rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
+	struct buffer_page *page;
 	unsigned long addr;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -275,10 +275,17 @@ rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffe
 	spin_lock_init(&cpu_buffer->lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->pages);
 
+	page = kzalloc_node(ALIGN(sizeof(*page), cache_line_size()),
+			    GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+	if (!page)
+		goto fail_free_buffer;
+
+	cpu_buffer->reader_page = page;
 	addr = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!addr)
-		goto fail_free_buffer;
-	cpu_buffer->reader_page = (struct buffer_page *)virt_to_page(addr);
+		goto fail_free_reader;
+	page->page = (void *)addr;
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->reader_page->list);
 	cpu_buffer->reader_page->size = 0;
 
@@ -523,11 +530,16 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffe
 
 	for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
 		for (i = 0; i < new_pages; i++) {
+			page = kzalloc_node(ALIGN(sizeof(*page),
+						  cache_line_size()),
+					    GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+			if (!page)
+				goto free_pages;
+			list_add(&page->list, &pages);
 			addr = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!addr)
 				goto free_pages;
-			page = (struct buffer_page *)virt_to_page(addr);
-			list_add(&page->list, &pages);
+			page->page = (void *)addr;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -567,9 +579,7 @@ static inline int rb_null_event(struct r
 
 static inline void *rb_page_index(struct buffer_page *page, unsigned index)
 {
-	void *addr = page_address(&page->page);
-
-	return addr + index;
+	return page->page + index;
 }
 
 static inline struct ring_buffer_event *


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC PATCH 1/2 v3] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Sep 25, 11:51 am)
[RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Sep 25, 6:02 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Masami Hiramatsu, (Thu Sep 25, 6:52 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Sep 25, 7:11 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Masami Hiramatsu, (Thu Sep 25, 7:47 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Sep 25, 8:20 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 12:18 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 3:45 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 3:47 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 4:00 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Sep 26, 9:04 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Masami Hiramatsu, (Fri Sep 26, 9:57 am)
[PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 10:11 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Fri Sep 26, 10:31 am)
Re: [PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Sep 26, 10:37 am)
Re: [PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 10:46 am)
[PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 11:05 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Richard Holden, (Fri Sep 26, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 11:39 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 11:59 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 12:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 12:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Martin Bligh, (Fri Sep 26, 12:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 12:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 26, 1:08 pm)
[PATCH v7] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 2:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Masami Hiramatsu, (Fri Sep 26, 2:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 2:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Mike Travis, (Fri Sep 26, 3:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Fri Sep 26, 3:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Sep 26, 4:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 4:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 4:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Mike Travis, (Fri Sep 26, 5:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Sep 26, 5:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 5:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 5:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 5:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Mike Travis, (Fri Sep 26, 5:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 5:52 pm)
[PATCH v8] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 7:02 pm)
[PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Sep 26, 11:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Sep 27, 10:02 am)
Re: [PATCH v5] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Sat Sep 27, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Sep 27, 11:39 am)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Sat Sep 27, 12:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Sep 27, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Sat Sep 27, 12:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Sep 27, 1:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Martin Bligh, (Sat Sep 27, 1:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Sep 27, 1:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 8:05 am)
[PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 9:10 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 9:11 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Sep 29, 4:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 5:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Sep 29, 5:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 5:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Sep 29, 8:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 29, 9:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Sep 30, 8:20 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 30, 8:54 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Sep 30, 9:38 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Sep 30, 9:48 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 30, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Sep 30, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Sep 30, 10:41 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 30, 10:49 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Sep 30, 10:56 am)
Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Sep 30, 11:02 am)
[PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Oct 1, 8:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Oct 1, 10:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Oct 1, 10:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Oct 1, 11:21 am)
[PATCH] ring-buffer: fix build error, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Oct 2, 2:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Andrew Morton, (Thu Oct 2, 2:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: allocate buffer page pointer, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 6:06 am)
Re: [boot crash] Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: fix build error, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 6:16 am)
Re: [boot crash] Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: fix build error, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 6:17 am)
Re: [boot crash] Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: fix build error, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 11:27 am)
[PATCH] ring_buffer: map to cpu not page, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 4:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: map to cpu not page, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 4:36 pm)
[PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Oct 2, 9:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 2, 10:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: map to cpu not page, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Oct 3, 12:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Oct 3, 8:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Oct 3, 9:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Oct 3, 10:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Oct 3, 10:54 am)
[PATCH] topology.h define mess fix, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Oct 3, 11:53 am)
RE: [PATCH] topology.h define mess fix, Luck, Tony, (Fri Oct 3, 1:14 pm)
[PATCH] topology.h define mess fix v2, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Oct 3, 3:47 pm)