Re: uml and -regparm=3

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...>
Cc: <andi@...>, <harvey.harrison@...>, <jdike@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <user-mode-linux-devel@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 5:32 pm

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:20:49PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

FASTCALL is useless and should not make a difference. It enables
regparm on specific functions, but that should not make a difference
if it works or not.

For working -mregparm you will need asmlinkage on all
functions that interface with assembler code to disable regparms for them.
The only exception is system calls which have the arguments on the stack
too.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:01 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 10, 3:32 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Jan 10, 5:05 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 10, 5:35 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Wed Jan 9, 6:01 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 5:12 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:20 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 9, 5:33 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 5:32 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:50 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Jeff Dike, (Wed Jan 9, 10:14 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 10:37 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jan 9, 10:45 pm)