Re: uml and -regparm=3

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <andi@...>, <harvey.harrison@...>
Cc: <jdike@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <user-mode-linux-devel@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 5:20 pm

> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> writes:

Ah, right.  I didn't think of that.

Does that mean that FASTCALL removals will have to be undone?  Or is
there an alternative?

Miklos
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:01 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 10, 3:32 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Jan 10, 5:05 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 10, 5:35 am)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Wed Jan 9, 6:01 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 5:12 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:20 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 9, 5:33 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 5:32 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 5:50 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Jeff Dike, (Wed Jan 9, 10:14 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 9, 10:37 pm)
Re: uml and -regparm=3, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jan 9, 10:45 pm)