Zachary Amsden wrote:Why should the bitsize of the CPU matter for this? It seems one of the less meaningful keys for this. Second, as I have mentioned, I don't believe this is really the case, especially not for the PIT, which is still present -- the PIT *semantics* has explicit timing constraints. Third, you still have ISA devices, they're just called LPC or PC104 devices these days. -hpa --
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Alan Cox | Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops |
| Vegard Nossum | [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API |
| Pallipadi, Venkatesh | RE: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 |
git: | |
| Jan Holesovsky | [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH resend] make "git push" update origin and mirrors, "git push --mirror" ... |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: [PATCH] diff-delta: produce optimal pack data |
| Sam Vilain | [PATCH] git-mergetool: add support for ediff |
| Michael | QEMU /dev/tun issue with tun device number > 3 (more than 4 guests) |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Predrag Punosevac | Re: OpenBSD project goals |
| Nick Guenther | Re: how to clear dmesg outpout |
| Stephen Pierce | SLS |
| C Wayne Huling | Re: Can males come from... |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
| David Willmore | Re: Intel, the Pentium and Linux |
