login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Christer Weinigel <christer@...>, David P. Reed <dpreed@...>, Avi Kivity <avi@...>, Ondrej Zary <linux@...>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Paul Rolland <rol@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, rol <rol@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 2:18 pm

Zachary Amsden wrote:

Why should the bitsize of the CPU matter for this?  It seems one of the 
less meaningful keys for this.

Second, as I have mentioned, I don't believe this is really the case, 
especially not for the PIT, which is still present -- the PIT 
*semantics* has explicit timing constraints.

Third, you still have ISA devices, they're just called LPC or PC104 
devices these days.

	-hpa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay ove..., Christer Weinigel, (Mon Jan 7, 11:15 pm)
Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port..., H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jan 9, 2:18 pm)
speck-geostationary