* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:then you have a truly ancient x86.git repository ;-) think of x86.git#mm as an open development tree. It's high-flux, based against Linux-bleeding-edge, it's frequently updated (daily, sometimes hourly), breakages are possible (and likely) and fixes and other feedback is more than welcome. And please feel free to complain about patches that are included. (like you did in the past) Also please try to post your patches as early as possible instead of in big chunks - last week's 75 patches patchbomb from you was (and still is) ... challenging ;-) i have measured the impact of the barriers and it was in the noise level. Barriers are notoriously easy to get wrong (because almost nothing tells the programmer that they are wrong), that's why i did this barrier-safe rdtsc() [& friends]. We had so much trouble with RDTSC during the past 10 years of its existence that being a bit more conservative with it is the only really maintainable option. Ingo --
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Masami Hiramatsu | Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Parag Warudkar | Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
