Re: [PATCH] show_task: real_parent

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 9:03 am

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Roland McGrath wrote:

Hmm. It could go both ways. If the problem is some ptrace()/wait4() 
interaction issue (which is certainly not unheard of!) the parent that 
matters for the kernel may be the right thing to print out.

I wonder if we should just print out both (or perhaps print out the 
ptrace parent only if it differs from the normal parent?)

I'll apply this, because I agree that it's sensible in general, I just 
wonder how often anybody really even cares about the parent information 
when it's not about some wait-related issue..

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] show_task: real_parent, Roland McGrath, (Wed Jan 9, 1:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] show_task: real_parent, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 9, 2:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] show_task: real_parent, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Jan 9, 9:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] show_task: real_parent, Roland McGrath, (Wed Jan 9, 1:15 pm)