On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:52:14 +0300 Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:You can't play fast and loose with data integrity. Besides, if we looked at things optimistically, we would conclude that no fsck will be needed, ever :) You will really want to read this paper, if you haven't already. -- All Rights Reversed --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Kevin Ballard | Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| David | User's mailing list? And multiple cherry pick |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jiri Olsa | [PATCH] net: fix race in the receive/select |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| Rick Jones | Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| list-obsd-misc | Re: low-MHz server |
| Luca Corti | Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Jerome Santos | sshd.config and AllowUsers |
