On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST, Matthew Wilcox said:

quoted text
> So you're saying that you can't find reliable ways to reproduce problems
> on demand?  Those are some of the lower quality bug reports, so I don't
> think we're losing much by having you not report them.

And in the next e-mail in my lkml folder we see:

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:21:45 EST, Parag Warudkar said:
quoted text
> BTW, I have so far tested 2.6.24-rc4/5/6/7 and 2.6.23.12 - all of
> which have this problem.
> 
> Yesterday I went back to using 2.6.22.15 and after a day's uptime it
> has not reproduced with the same config.
> 
> Time for git-bisect I suppose? (the only problem is that this takes
> anywhere between 20 minutes to 8 hrs to confirm reliably.)

Are you saying that we're not losing much if Parag says "screw it" and
doesn't report the problem?