On 01/08/2008 11:17 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
quoted text >>> Most of these kernel changes would probably get in the way of real
>>> development, making patches reject that would otherwise apply.
>> I'm curious, in what way would they interfere?
>
> Developer A work one some complicated stuff in foo.c which is
> not yet -mm fooder.
>
> Developer B submits and have applied a massive cleanup to some of the
> files touced by Developer A's patch.
>
> Developer A now needs to fix up his stuff.
Ok, to be honest, how often is this a problem?
And then, how hard is it to rebase the patch?
And if it is a problem, then you can still drop a message, such as don't do
this, I have a big patch here.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/ia32/ia3... , Jiri Slaby , (Tue Jan 8, 6:55 pm)