Potential bugs notwithstanding, given that this is a STREAM socket, and 
as such shouldn't (I hope, or I'm eating toes for dinner again) have 
side effects like tossing the rest of a datagram, why are you using 
MSG_PEEK?  Why not simply read the N bytes of the message that will have 
the message length with a normal read/recv, and then read that many 
bytes in the next call?

rick jones
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/