On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text
> 
> ok done; I had to fizzle a bit because some things aren't *exactly* a 
> BUG() statement but I track them anyway (things like the "sleeping in 
> invalid context" check), so I had to somewhat arbitrarily assign 
> categories for those. I might fine tune these over time some; if you or 
> someone else sees problems with categorization please let me know

Looking good. I wonder if we could also have some way to cross-ref these 
things with the regression list (notably try to get pointers to them in 
the regression list). 

Right now, the regression list keeps track of the things that are closed, 
but kerneloops.org obviously doesn't see that, so it's not obvious which 
oopses are "uninteresting" since they've been fixed.

			Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/