On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:Cool. One thing I wonder about - could you separate out the bug-ons and warnings from the oopses? They really are different issues, and an oops with register information etc is very different from a BUG() with line numbers, which in turn is very different from a WARN_ON(). Right now, it says Oopses reported for kernel 2.6.24-rc7 7 oopses reported hfsplus_releasepage 3 enqueue_task 1 lock_acquire 1 __hfs_brec_find 1 __ieee80211_rx 1 and in fact three of those five entries are really WARN_ON's. It would be nicer if it would look more along the lines of Backtraces reported for kernel 2.6.24-rc7 4 oopses reported hfsplus_releasepage 3 __hfs_brec_find 1 3 warnings repored enqueue_task 1 lock_acquire 1 __ieee80211_rx 1 because those things really don't have the same kind of impact at all, and tend to be very different to debug (a "BUG_ON()" is perhaps somewhat closer to an oops, but a WARN_ON() is definitely in a class of its own). On that "Code:" side, it seems there is still some problem with oops parsing. See for example: http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=1521&msgid=http://mid.gmane.org/20071017154655... and notice how the Code: never made it into the raw message (and thus there is also no instruction disassembly). Linus --
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg KH | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
