On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Rene Herman wrote:If the ISA bus is below 8 MHz, we might need a longer delay. If we default to the longer delay, the delay will be too long for more than 99,99 % of all systems, not counting i586+. Especially if the driver is fine-tuned to give maximum throughput, this may be bad. OTOH, the DOS drivers I heared about use delays and would break on underclocked ISA busses if the n * ISA_HZ delay was needed. Maybe somebody having a configurable ISA bus speed and some problematic chips can test it ... -- Fun things to slip into your budget "I [Meow Cat] sliped in 'Legal fees for firing Jim (Jim's my [his] boss).' Jim approved the budget and was fired when upper management saw the budget." --
| Avi Kivity | [PATCH 09/58] KVM: MMU: Respect nonpae pagetable quadrant when zapping ptes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT *] Solos PCI ADSL card update |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
