Re: free_pages_check

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 11:34 pm

On Tuesday 08 January 2008 13:43, Yinghai Lu wrote:

Because the positive case is extremely rare, so there is no benefit (nor
any correctness requirement) for short-circuit evaluation, and we don't
want to have all the branches that it involves. I think it is 3 more
conditional jumps.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
free_pages_check, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Jan 7, 10:43 pm)
Re: free_pages_check, Nick Piggin, (Mon Jan 7, 11:34 pm)
Re: free_pages_check, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jan 8, 1:44 am)
Re: free_pages_check, Nick Piggin, (Tue Jan 8, 3:44 am)
Re: free_pages_check, Andrew Morton, (Mon Jan 7, 11:08 pm)