> On Jan 6, 2008 2:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> > > > > > Submitter : "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date : 2007-12-07 18:14
> > > > > > References :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/299
> > > > > >
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9525
> > > > > > Handled-By : "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> > > > > > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > > >
> > > > > i think this only occurs with cpuidle, right? drivers/cpuidle/ and
> > > > > CPU_IDLE is new in 2.6.24 so this appears to be a bug in that code (or a
> > > > > bug elsewhere triggered by that code), not a regression from v2.6.23.
> > > >
> > > > OK, removed from the regressions list.
> > >
> > > Nope - actually it did happen without CPU_IDLE so it is definitely a regression.
> > > (See
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/93 )
> > >
> > > And it does happen with latest git which I believe has your patch Ingo.
> > >
> > > So I would suggest to keep it on the list of regressions.
> >
> > OK
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> >
>
> BTW, I have so far tested 2.6.24-rc4/5/6/7 and 2.6.23.12 - all of
> which have this problem.
