Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...>
Cc: <hch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <bfennema@...>, <jack@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 7:28 pm

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> wrote:


Confused.  How can patch 1/n come "later" than this one?

Your patches actually came through as "[patch] udf: ...".  ie: no
sequence numbering.


Please fix the sequence numbering too, thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Jan 7, 8:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Jan 7, 4:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Andrew Morton, (Mon Jan 7, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Marcin Slusarz, (Tue Jan 8, 2:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] udf: check if udf_load_logicalvol failed, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Jan 7, 8:19 am)
[PATCH] udf: remove some ugly macros, , (Sat Jan 5, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: fix coding style of super.c, Jan Kara, (Mon Jan 7, 9:33 am)