Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 4:28 pm

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> wrote:


Confused.  How can patch 1/n come "later" than this one?

Your patches actually came through as "[patch] udf: ...".  ie: no
sequence numbering.


Please fix the sequence numbering too, thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/6] udf: improve code related to super_block v3, marcin.slusarz, (Sat Jan 5, 5:44 pm)
[PATCH] udf: fix coding style of super.c, marcin.slusarz, (Sat Jan 5, 5:44 pm)
[PATCH] udf: remove some ugly macros, marcin.slusarz, (Sat Jan 5, 5:44 pm)
[PATCH] udf: check if udf_load_logicalvol failed, marcin.slusarz, (Sat Jan 5, 5:44 pm)
[PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, marcin.slusarz, (Sat Jan 5, 5:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: check if udf_load_logicalvol failed, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Jan 7, 5:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] udf: fix coding style of super.c, Jan Kara, (Mon Jan 7, 6:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Jan 7, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Andrew Morton, (Mon Jan 7, 4:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions, Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Jan 7, 11:52 pm)