login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, <7eggert@...>, Christer Weinigel <christer@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, David P. Reed <dpreed@...>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Paul Rolland <rol@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <rol@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 7:25 pm

> But overclocking is not the problem for udelay, it would err to the safe 

If you get it wrong you risk data corruption. Not good, not clever, not
appropriate. Basically the use of port 0x80 is the right thing to do for
ISA devices and as 15 odd years of use has shown works reliably and
solidly for ISA systems.

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay ove..., Christer Weinigel, (Mon Jan 7, 11:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay ove..., Alan Cox, (Mon Jan 7, 7:25 pm)
speck-geostationary