On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:=20 =20 Its an artifact of rt group scheduling. Each group will have to specify a period and runtime limit therein (and the normalized sum thereof must not exceed the total time available - otherwise the set is not schedulable). So say we have two groups A and B. A has a period of 2 seconds and a runtime limit of 1, that gives him an avg of 50% cpu time. If B then has a period of 1 second with a runtime limit of .25s (avg 25%) the total time required to schedule the realtime groups would be 75% on average. Without group scheduling everything is considered one group but we still have the period and runtime limits. So as long as the realtime cpu usage fits within the given limits it acts as before. Once it exceeds its limit it will be capped hard - which is ok, since it exceeded its hard limit, and realtime applications are supposed to be deterministic and thus be able to tell how much time they'd require. [ If only this model were true, but its a model frequently used and quite accepted ]
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Yaroslav Tarasenko | Re: PC-BSD |
| Ben Cadieux | DragonFly MBR |
| justin | Re: dragonfly pdf documentation |
| dark0s Optik | DragonFly over Sony Vaio |
