On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted text
> kernel/suspend_64.c and power/cpu.c were equivalent. Move them into
> power/cpu_*.c for consistency.
> 
> power/swsusp.S and kernel/suspend_asm_64.S were both misnamed and
> equivalent. Merge then minto power/hibernation_*.S.

Well, all of that are changes in the right direction, but I'm not sure if it's
the right time to do that just now.  For example, suspend_64.c in your patch
is missing the comments on __save/restore_processor_state() already queued
up for 2.6.25 by Ingo.

Any chance to base the patch on top of the mm branch of
/pub/scm / linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git ?

Thanks,
Rafael
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/