Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quoted text > No. I mean call the bit PG_private2. That way non-pagecache and
> filesystems that don't use fscache can use it.
The bit is called PG_owner_priv_2, and then 'subclassed' to PG_fscache, much
like PG_owner_priv_1 is 'subclassed' to PG_checked as was recommended.
David
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 10/28] FS-Cache: Recruit a couple of page flags f... , David Howells , (Mon Jan 7, 9:09 am)