Dave Young wrote:Therefore you eventually need to repost it as a single patch. It can't go into one of the maintainer trees otherwise, because they only take fully bijectable patches. (Kernel must build and run at any point in between any patch series.) I was going to test it at runtime on top of 2.6.24-rc6, but the first and second patch depend on stuff in -mm. So, my laziness wins for now, as -mm is not my cup of tea. About your changelog: "xyz: convert semaphore to mutex in struct class Use mutex instead of semaphore in struct class. Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>" You don't need the second line because it says the same as the first line. Either kill it, or replace it by an explanation _why_ the semaphore is to be replaced by mutex. (I guess you do it because they are lighter-weight, both in semantics and in implementation, and because there are better facilities to debug mutexes...) -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ---= --==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
