Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:09:44 +0100
> Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se> wrote:
>
>   
>>>> (btw, wouldn't 'var != 0' actually be the proper semantic instead
>>>> of playing with '!'s?)
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> no because var could be a pointer for example...
>>>   
>>>       
>> You mean because in that case it would be '!= NULL', do you? Sorry,
>> do not see your point here.
>>     
>
> my point is that you don't know which one to use.. 
>   
Sorry to be a bother, but why is that relevant? Except semantics, they 
are the same, right? So what problem would it be if you send it a 
pointer? The '!' uses the same "argument/reason" when given a pointer ;).
quoted text
> But this isn't new discussion (nor something I'm changing at all); this has come
> up since way back in 2005 :)
> If you feel strongly of changing this, feel free to post a patch; for now I much
> rather leave things as they are right now.
>   
Oh o-well, in such case I may come back and do a larger patching 
someday. Just though since you were in the neighborhood...

Have a good evening
Richard Knutsson

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/