On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:29:46PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:You said: "The graphic UIs including menuconfig currently work best for tree-like dependencies" That's true. And the dependency graph can't be a tree. Currently, defining the ordered tree the UIs present to the user is done _once_ in kconfig. Our UIs either show this tree as a tree or go through the tree depth-first and present the options in this order to the user. And I think your main misunderstanding is that you think the dependencies alone would carry enough information for allowing an UI to present the options in a way not worse than it's currently done - that's simply not true. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed --
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
