Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...>
Date: Saturday, January 5, 2008 - 11:53 pm

> Maybe, but we can usually work around it pretty comfortably.

Hrm... as of today, it's mostly called from a kernel thread but I don't
totally iron out the possibility that we add control to those things via
sysfs... But that's definitely an option for now.

However, that's only part of the problem. There's a lot of I2C accesses
(and other SMU accesses to read SMU based sensors) and I doubt we can
make all of that "magically" interruptible.

I would much prefer if we had a way to tag a kernel thread to not add to
the load average when in interruptible sleep :-)


Ben.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Robin H. Johnson, (Sun Dec 30, 6:06 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Andrew Morton, (Sat Jan 5, 5:30 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Robin H. Johnson, (Sat Jan 5, 6:04 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sat Jan 5, 6:18 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Andrew Morton, (Sat Jan 5, 11:05 pm)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Paul Mackerras, (Sun Jan 6, 7:21 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Robin H. Johnson, (Sun Jan 6, 7:29 am)
Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sat Jan 5, 11:53 pm)