> Maybe, but we can usually work around it pretty comfortably.
Hrm... as of today, it's mostly called from a kernel thread but I don't
totally iron out the possibility that we add control to those things via
sysfs... But that's definitely an option for now.
However, that's only part of the problem. There's a lot of I2C accesses
(and other SMU accesses to read SMU based sensors) and I doubt we can
make all of that "magically" interruptible.
I would much prefer if we had a way to tag a kernel thread to not add to
the load average when in interruptible sleep :-)
Ben.
--