On Jan 4 2008 19:39, Theodore Tso wrote:
quoted text >On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:12:44AM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>
>But because running some kind of mechanical script and fixing up the
>problems is relatively mindless, it doesn't *add* anything. Only the
>maintainer knows when it is a reasonably convenient time to fix all of
>the problems, or when to fix portions of the code that is being
>reworked anyway --- and the maintainer can just run the script by
>himself, for himself.
I have to agree. Best use of checkpatch is right before submitting, uh,
a patch actually. The option that makes it work on non-patch files
should be, hm, hidden or removed.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [Coding Style]: misc fixes for fs/ext{3,4}/acl.{... , Jan Engelhardt , (Sat Jan 5, 5:24 pm)