On Thu, Jan 31 2008 at 18:39 +0200, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:
quoted text
> Hi,
> 
> On Jan 31 2008 14:35, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Thanks, Perhaps someone else then. 
>> Anyone with gdth HW that can test patches?
> 
> Is bisecting down the existing chain and finding the bad commit 
> sufficient? (I also take new patches.)
Most certainly. If you are willing, please... I'm looking for someone
responsive.

first -  enable debug prints (see the original post)
         and send me the prints.
second - bisection could be grate yes.
third - accepting patches and testing could be grate, thanks.

quoted text
> 
>> Your lspci said: "Intel Corporation RAID Controller" Matthew
>> is there a gdth card lying around in an Intel lab near you?
>>
>> James do we need to mark gdth BROKEN for 2.6.24 and higher?
> 
> I say revert it for the time being.

It could be reverted for 2.6.24.x  maintenance releases but for 2.6.25-xxx
it cannot as it will not compile, and the fix to that is what you see in code.

Boaz
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/