On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:15:50AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:You tested x86 but broke more than half a dozen other archtectures, with at least 3 different commits breaking other architectures. It now takes a few days until this mess is completely sorted out, and I hope there won't be too many poor souls having to bisect 2.6.25-rc1 regresions on !x86 since this can now become the pure horror. And if people give up trying to bisect 2.6.25 might ship with more regressions. I already said in the past that the x86 tree contains not architecture specific stuff that doesn't belong there, and looking at the following parts of the diffstat, most of it does simply not belong into an "x86 arch update": --
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| Andrew Morton | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (paravirt/vsmp/no PCI) |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
