Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI related Kconfig warning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Brownell <david-b@...>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...>, <spi-devel-general@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 5:27 am

On Jan 31, 2008 3:21 PM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

Nope.

If moving the symbol PXA_SSP to the "depends on" list, this option will
remain invisible if a careless user does not select PXA_SSP.

Yet I'm not sure this is the way to go or mandatory by the kconfig rules.




-- 
Cheers
- eric
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SPI related Kconfig warning, Kumar Gala, (Thu Jan 31, 12:41 am)
Re: SPI related Kconfig warning, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Feb 2, 4:51 pm)
Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI related Kconfig warning, David Brownell, (Thu Jan 31, 3:21 am)
Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI related Kconfig warning, eric miao, (Thu Jan 31, 5:27 am)