Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Måns Rullgård <mans@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 8:46 pm

Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> writes:


Not a problem, unless it is booted when sold.  Even that might not be
a problem, since it would be a matter of transferring ownership of a
single copy, not creating and distributing new copies, and the GPL
does is only concerned with the latter.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Måns Rullgård, (Tue Jan 29, 7:25 pm)
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jan 29, 8:35 pm)
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Måns Rullgård, (Tue Jan 29, 8:46 pm)
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed Jan 30, 3:38 am)
RE: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, David Schwartz, (Wed Jan 30, 5:00 pm)
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Måns Rullgård, (Wed Jan 30, 4:45 am)
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux, Daniel Hazelton, (Tue Jan 29, 9:44 pm)