On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 00:57 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:No, I'm representing myself only. I don't think you represent all kernel developers when posting from the kernel.org address. I'm actually surprised that you are raising this issue. If the motivation to ban ndiswrapper is based on the copyright law, doesn't it meant that we have DRM in the kernel now? Is Linux going to enforce copyright laws across the world? Absolutely not. I, for one, would welcome an informed position of the FSF. It may have interesting implications for Wine, ReactOS, mplayer, qemu, Java and many other programs loading non-free compiled code at the run time. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin --
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| Andrew Morton | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (paravirt/vsmp/no PCI) |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
