On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 00:57 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:22:45PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > It have come to my attention that a patch has been committed to the
> > kernel with the explicit purpose of tainting ndiswrapper - the kernel
> > module allowing Windows NDIS drivers for Ethernet and Wireless cards to
> > be used by the kernel.
> >...
> > Just to reiterate some points from the old discussion:
> >...
> > - no copyright violation is involved, as Windows drivers are not derived
> > from Linux sources
> >...
> 
> It is interesting that someone posting with an @gnu.org address claims
> that dynamic linking of not GPLv2 compatible code into GPLv2 code was
> not a copyright violation.

No, I'm representing myself only.  I don't think you represent all
kernel developers when posting from the kernel.org address.

I'm actually surprised that you are raising this issue.  If the
motivation to ban ndiswrapper is based on the copyright law, doesn't it
meant that we have DRM in the kernel now?  Is Linux going to enforce
copyright laws across the world?

quoted text
> Is it an official statement of the FSF that such linking is considered 
> legal?

Absolutely not.

quoted text
> (RMS added to Cc)

I, for one, would welcome an informed position of the FSF.  It may have
interesting implications for Wine, ReactOS, mplayer, qemu, Java and many
other programs loading non-free compiled code at the run time.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/