Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@...>, Avi Kivity <avi@...>, Izik Eidus <izike@...>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, <kvm-devel@...>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <steiner@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <daniel.blueman@...>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 4:30 pm

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:


We invalidate the range *after* populating it? Isnt it okay to establish 
references while populate_range() runs?


What we did is to invalidate the page (?!) before taking the pte lock. In 
the lock we replace the pte to point to another page. This means that we 
need to clear stale information. So we zap it before. If another reference 
is established after taking the spinlock then the pte contents have 
changed at the cirtical section fails.

Before the critical section starts we have gotten an extra refcount on the 
original page so the page cannot vanish from under us.


Now we invalidate the page after the transaction is complete. This means 
external pte can persist while we change the pte? Possibly even dirty the 
page?



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ra..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Jan 28, 4:28 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Jan 29, 12:20 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 3:55 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 5:35 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 6:39 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 3:35 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 3:50 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 8:01 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to inval..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 10:08 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to inval..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Wed Jan 30, 10:42 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to inval..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 10:51 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to inval..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 9:46 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] mmu_notifier: invalidate_range_start with lo..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 10:56 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to inval..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 10:37 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 8:20 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 3:41 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 30, 4:55 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 8:35 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 8:22 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 4:30 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 5:53 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 6:55 pm)
Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jan 29, 8:34 pm)