Greg,

Have you given Grant's suggestion any further consideration?

I'd like to know how the MMCONFIG issues discussed in this thread are going
to be handled upstream. I have a patch implemented in RHEL 5.2, but I would
rather have the upstream patch implemented, whatever it is.


Grant Grundler wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:56:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:46:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>> But so far, we have a zillion patches floating around, claiming
>>> different things, some with signed-off-bys and others without, so for
>>> now, I'll just stick with Arjan's patch in -mm and see if anyone
>>> complains about those releases...
>> I complain about Arjan's patch.  For reasons which have been adequately
>> gone into already in this thread.
> 
> Agreed.
> Greg, I think at least two better alternatives were proposed already.
> Please review the thread again.
> 
> grant

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/