Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...>, Steve French <smfrench@...>, <swhiteho@...>, <sfrench@...>, <vandrove@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Monday, January 28, 2008 - 8:56 am

> > No specific spec, just general quality of implementation.

Agree entirely: the spec doesn't allow for random scribbling in the wrong
place. It doesn't cover which goes first or who "wins" the race but
provides pwrite/pread for that situation. Writing somewhere unrelated is
definitely not to spec and not good.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] [13/18] BKL-removal: Add compat_ioctl for cifs, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 26, 10:17 pm)
[PATCH] [9/18] BKL-removal: Use unlocked_ioctl for jfs, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 26, 10:17 pm)
[PATCH] [14/18] BKL-removal: Add unlocked_fasync, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 26, 10:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [14/18] BKL-removal: Add unlocked_fasync, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Jan 27, 3:05 am)
[PATCH] [4/18] ext3: Remove incorrect BKL comment, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 26, 10:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek, Trond Myklebust, (Mon Jan 28, 12:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek, Alan Cox, (Mon Jan 28, 8:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek, Trond Myklebust, (Mon Jan 28, 12:51 am)