Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@...>
Cc: <vatsa@...>, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <dhaval@...>
Date: Monday, January 28, 2008 - 4:38 am

Toralf Förster wrote:
In theory, the fix is simple:
If _non-niced_ tasks use more than 80% of the cputime _made available to 
them_,
then  increase the processor speed.

The cputime allocated to niced tasks (that may be cpu intensive but 
shouldn't
cause max speed on their own) won't matter then.

Helge Hafting
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Sat Jan 26, 1:11 pm)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2..., Srivatsa Vaddagiri, (Sun Jan 27, 10:46 am)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2..., Srivatsa Vaddagiri, (Sun Jan 27, 12:54 pm)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2..., Helge Hafting, (Mon Jan 28, 4:38 am)