Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Helge Hafting
Date: Monday, January 28, 2008 - 1:38 am

Toralf Förster wrote:
In theory, the fix is simple:
If _non-niced_ tasks use more than 80% of the cputime _made available to 
them_,
then  increase the processor speed.

The cputime allocated to niced tasks (that may be cpu intensive but 
shouldn't
cause max speed on their own) won't matter then.

Helge Hafting
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and ..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Sat Jan 26, 10:11 am)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and ..., Srivatsa Vaddagiri, (Sun Jan 27, 7:46 am)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and ..., Srivatsa Vaddagiri, (Sun Jan 27, 9:54 am)
Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and ..., Helge Hafting, (Mon Jan 28, 1:38 am)