On Saturday 26 January 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:I did not even consider that meaning of built-in, but that does seem more descriptive. Of course :-) --- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> To avoid confusion between 'built-in' drivers and 'on-board' controllers, consistently use the term 'on-board' for controllers. Minor line-wrapping improvements in descriptions for config options. Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> --- Spelling for on-board seems to be rather inconsistent. All of "on board", "on-board" and onboard currently occur. I've chosen "on-board" as that seems most correct to me.
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Kirsher | [net-next PATCH 1/7] e1000e: enable CRC stripping by default |
| Jukka Andberg | ata/wdc vs gcc3 on amiga |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: wd.c patch to reduce kernel stack usage |
| Jason Thorpe | Re: ksyms patches. |
| rick | NFS transport |
