[PATCH] Use on-board instead of built-in in config options

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <torvalds@...>
Date: Sunday, January 27, 2008 - 11:20 am

On Saturday 26 January 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

I did not even consider that meaning of built-in, but that does seem more 
descriptive.


Of course :-)

---
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

To avoid confusion between 'built-in' drivers and 'on-board'
controllers, consistently use the term 'on-board' for controllers.

Minor line-wrapping improvements in descriptions for config options.

Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

---
Spelling for on-board seems to be rather inconsistent. All of "on board",
"on-board" and onboard currently occur. I've chosen "on-board" as that seems 
most correct to me.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[git patches] IDE updates part #2, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Sat Jan 26, 3:43 pm)
Re: From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz &lt;bzolnier@gmail.com&g..., Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Sat Jan 26, 5:08 pm)
[PATCH] Use on-board instead of built-in in config options, Frans Pop, (Sun Jan 27, 11:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] Use on-board instead of built-in in config options, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Fri Feb 1, 5:49 pm)