Toralf Förster wrote:

quoted text
> I use a 1-liner for a simple performance check : "time factor 819734028463158891"
> Here is the result for the new (Gentoo) kernel 2.6.24:
> 
> With the  ondemand governor of the  I get:
> 
> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
> 
> real    0m32.997s
> user    0m15.732s
> sys     0m0.014s
> 
> With the ondemand governor the CPU runs at 600 MHz,
> whereas with the performance governor I get :
> 
> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
> 
> real    0m10.893s
> user    0m5.444s
> sys     0m0.000s
> 
> (~5.5 sec as I expected) b/c the CPU is set to 1.7 GHz.
> 
> The ondeman governor of previous kernel versions however automatically increased
> the CPU speed from 600 MHz to 1.7 GHz.
> 
> My system is a ThinkPad T41, I'll attach the .config 

During the test, run top, and watch your CPU usage. Does it go above 80% 
(the default for 
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold).

ondemand CPUfreq governor has a few tunables, described in 
Documentation/cpu-freq. One of them is up_threshold:

up_threshold: defines what the average CPU usaged between the samplings
of 'sampling_rate' needs to be for the kernel to make a decision on
whether it should increase the frequency. For example when it is set
to its default value of '80' it means that between the checking
intervals the CPU needs to be on average more than 80% in use to then
decide that the CPU frequency needs to be increased.

What CPUFreq processor driver are you using?


I had a similar problem with CPUfreq and dm-crypt (slow reads), see 
(more setup problem than something kernel-related):

http://blog.wpkg.org/2008/01/22/cpufreq-and-dm-crypt-performance-problems/


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/