Alexey Eremenko wrote:
quoted text >> Generally I see no problem with it. But at least for NPT I don't see a
>> reason why someone should want to disable it on a VM basis (as far as it
>> works stable). Avi, what do you think?
>>
>>
>
> 1. This is more user-friendly and easier-to-find
>
I'm inclined to disagree. Why add an additional thing for people to
tune if they really shouldn't need to. Once NPT/EPT support are stable,
is there any reason to want to disable it?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
quoted text > 2. A lot of people would like to view (and Demo) it side-by-side.
>
> 3. Useful for BETA-testing of KVM.
>
>
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 3/8] SVM: add module parameter to d ... , Anthony Liguori , (Sat Jan 26, 9:36 am)