From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:28:20 +0100That's a very poor filter, I don't write much code lately in the networking. I only provide theoretical direction in a few specific areas I care about. As Ingo already knows, I think this "put everything on lkml" argument is bogus. And about bisectability, every time I apply a networking patch I do at the very least a "allmodconfig" build with just that new patch added, for every patch. Often I do more extensive build testing. And when I rebase the tree, I rerun this check after each patch gets re-applied to a new base tree. In fact I'm working on such issues as I fly over the Australia for LCA08 :-) So this isn't an issue that posting to lkml is going to help. --
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Alex Chiang | [PATCH 1/4] Remove path attribute from sgi_hotplug |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
