On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:59:38PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:Seems like pointless complexity to me - what happens if a timeout occurs while the filsystem is still freezing? It's not uncommon for a freeze to take minutes if memory is full of dirty data that needs to be flushed out, esp. if dm-snap is doing COWs for every write issued.... .... .... .... ..... That's inherently unsafe - you can have multiple unfreezes running in parallel which seriously screws with the bdev semaphore count that is used to lock the device due to doing multiple up()s for every down. Your timeout thingy guarantee that at some point you will get multiple up()s occuring due to the timer firing racing with a thaw ioctl. If this interface is to be more widely exported, then it needs a complete revamp of the bdev is locked while it is frozen so that there is no chance of a double up() ever occuring on the bd_mount_sem due to racing thaws..... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group --
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
