Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Modules

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jon Masters <jcm@...>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...>, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Friday, January 25, 2008 - 11:27 pm

On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:31:30 Jon Masters wrote:

I think there are two things here:
1) Currently we allow modules with no kallsyms info to be loaded into a 
KALLSYMS kernel (and taint).  A new option is needed to control this: 
CONFIG_ACCEPT_NO_KALLSYMS under KERNEL_DEBUG which allows loading of 
such "stripped" modules (a-la modprobe --force).

2) Unconditionally reject modules with a wrong module section size.  Currently 
we have no such check, which means without KALLSYMS, anything goes.

Thoughts?
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Tue Jan 22, 3:13 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Tue Jan 22, 11:00 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Jan 22, 11:10 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Wed Jan 23, 12:17 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Wed Jan 23, 9:14 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 10:48 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, , (Thu Jan 24, 1:25 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Thu Jan 24, 2:19 am)
[PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Modules, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Jan 24, 8:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Mod..., Rusty Russell, (Fri Jan 25, 11:27 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:01 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Wed Jan 23, 12:33 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 1:11 pm)