Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_clear()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...>, Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@...>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...>, William Irwin <wli@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Friday, January 25, 2008 - 7:44 pm

Keir Fraser wrote:

Yeah, I found that document, and mentioned it a little lower in the mail ;)


Hm, but then chapter 10 goes and makes things confusing with 
"Alternative INVLPG Behavior"; but I guess if software needs to 
explicitly enable this behaviour in a yet-to-be-determined way, its OK...

Is there any guide about the tradeoff of when to use invlpg vs flushing 
the whole tlb?  1 page?  10?  90% of the tlb?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_cl..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 25, 6:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_cl..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 25, 8:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_cl..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 25, 7:44 pm)