Keir Fraser wrote:
quoted text > Go read the Intel application note "TLBs, Paging-Structure Caches, and Their
> Invalidation" at
http://www.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/317080.pdf
>
> Section 8.1 explains about the PDPTR cache in 32-bit PAE mode, which can
> only be refreshed by appropriate tickling of CR0, CR3 or CR4.
>
Yeah, I found that document, and mentioned it a little lower in the mail ;)
quoted text > It is also important to note that *any* valid page directory entry at *any*
> level in the page-table hierarchy can become cached at *any* time. Basically
> TLB lookup is performed as a longest-prefix match on the linear address to
> skip as many levels in a page-table walk as possible (where a walk is
> needed, because there is no full-length match on the linear address). So, if
> you modify a directory entry from present to not-present, or change the page
> directory that a valid pde points to, you probably need to flush the pde
> caching structure. One piece of good news is that all pde caches are flushed
> by any arbitrary INVLPG.
>
Hm, but then chapter 10 goes and makes things confusing with
"Alternative INVLPG Behavior"; but I guess if software needs to
explicitly enable this behaviour in a yet-to-be-determined way, its OK...
Is there any guide about the tradeoff of when to use invlpg vs flushing
the whole tlb? 1 page? 10? 90% of the tlb?
J
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_cl... , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , (Fri Jan 25, 7:44 pm)