Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Modules

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...>, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Friday, January 25, 2008 - 11:31 am

On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 08:56 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:


The former is actually trivially doable with the module->taints bits. We
could have the equivalent of a neon flashing "blame this module" sign.

I also agree, we should stop force loading. Incompatible struct module,
etc. are really bad things to have mapped into a running kernel.

Jon.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Tue Jan 22, 3:13 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Tue Jan 22, 11:00 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Jan 22, 11:10 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Wed Jan 23, 12:17 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Wed Jan 23, 9:14 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 10:48 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, , (Thu Jan 24, 1:25 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Thu Jan 24, 2:19 am)
[PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Modules, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Jan 24, 8:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Mod..., Jon Masters, (Fri Jan 25, 11:31 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:01 am)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Jon Masters, (Wed Jan 23, 12:33 pm)
Re: CONFIG_MARKERS, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 1:11 pm)